Search Results


Albany Law School
American University
Appalachian School of Law
Arizona State University
Arizona Summit Law School
Ave Maria School of Law
Barry University
Baylor University
Belmont University
Boston College
Boston University
Brigham Young University
Brooklyn Law School
California Western School of Law
Campbell University
Capital University
Cardozo-Yeshiva University
Case Western Reserve University
Catholic University of America
Chapman University
Charleston School of Law
Charlotte School of Law
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
Columbia University
Concordia University School of Law
Cornell University
Creighton University
DePaul University
Drake University
Drexel University
Duke University
Duquesne University
Elon Law School
Emory University
Faulkner University
Florida A&M University
Florida Coastal School of Law
Florida International University
Florida State University
Fordham University
George Mason University
George Washington University
Georgetown University
Georgia State University
Golden Gate University
Gonzaga University
Harvard University
Hofstra University
Howard University
Indiana Tech
Indiana University - Bloomington
Indiana University - Indianapolis
Inter American University
John Marshall Law School - Atlanta
Lewis and Clark College
Liberty University
Lincoln Memorial University
Louisiana State University
Loyola Marymount University
Loyola University Chicago
Loyola University New Orleans
Marquette University
Mercer University
Michigan State University
Mississippi College
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
New England School of Law
New York Law School
New York University
North Carolina Central University
Northeastern University
Northern Illinois University
Northern Kentucky University
Northwestern University
Nova Southeastern University
Ohio Northern University
Ohio State University
Oklahoma City University
Pace University
Pennsylvania State University - Dickinson Law
Pennsylvania State University - Penn State Law
Pepperdine University
Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico
Quinnipiac University
Regent University
Roger Williams University
Rutgers University
Samford University
Santa Clara University
Seattle University
Seton Hall University
South Texas College of Law Houston
Southern Illinois University
Southern Methodist University
Southern University Law Center
Southwestern Law School
St. John's University
St. Louis University
St. Mary's University
St. Thomas University - Florida
Stanford University
Stetson University
Suffolk University
SUNY Buffalo
Syracuse University
Temple University
Texas A&M
Texas Southern University
Texas Tech University
Thomas Jefferson School of Law
Thomas M Cooley Law School
Touro College
Tulane University
University of Akron
University of Alabama
University of Arizona
University of Arkansas - Fayetteville
University of Arkansas - Little Rock
University of Baltimore
University of California - Berkeley
University of California - Davis
University of California - Hastings
University of California - Irvine
University of California - Los Angeles
University of Chicago
University of Cincinnati
University of Colorado
University of Connecticut
University of Dayton
University of Denver
University of Detroit Mercy
University of Florida
University of Georgia
University of Hawaii
University of Houston
University of Idaho
University of Illinois
University of Illinois at Chicago - John Marshall Law School
University of Iowa
University of Kansas
University of Kentucky
University of La Verne
University of Louisville
University of Maine
University of Maryland
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
University of Memphis
University of Miami
University of Michigan
University of Minnesota
University of Mississippi
University of Missouri - Columbia
University of Missouri - Kansas City
University of Montana
University of Nebraska
University of Nevada - Las Vegas
University of New Hampshire
University of New Mexico
University of North Carolina
University of North Dakota
University of North Texas Dallas College of Law
University of Notre Dame
University of Oklahoma
University of Oregon
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pittsburgh
University of Puerto Rico
University of Richmond
University of San Diego
University of San Francisco
University of South Carolina
University of South Dakota
University of Southern California
University of St. Thomas - Minneapolis
University of Tennessee
University of Texas
University of The District of Columbia
University of the Pacific
University of Toledo
University of Tulsa
University of Utah
University of Virginia
University of Washington
University of Wisconsin
University of Wyoming
Valparaiso University
Vanderbilt University
Vermont Law School
Villanova University
Wake Forest University
Washburn University
Washington and Lee University
Washington University in St Louis
Wayne State University
West Virginia University
Western New England University School of Law
Western State University
Whittier Law School
Widener University - Delaware
Widener University - Pennsylvania
Willamette University
William and Mary
Yale University
Last Updated: March 1, 2017

The Value of the U.S. News Rankings

Every year, the law school world overreacts to slightly-shuffled U.S. News rankings. Proud alumni and worried students voice concerns. Provosts threaten jobs. Prospective students confuse the annual shuffle with genuine reputational change.

Law school administrators react predictably. They articulate methodological flaws and lament negative externalities, but nevertheless commit to the rankings game through their statements and actions. Assuring stakeholders bearing pitchforks has become part of the job description.

If the rankings measured something useful, the entire charade would be much easier to stomach. The unfortunate irony is that these rankings adversely affect the decision-making process for law school administrators and prospective law students alike. The stakes are high. Our profession and society need law schools that don't figure inefficient metrics into annual budgets. Dollars spent chasing U.S. News rankings diverts funds away from students' education. It also stands in the way of reducing tuition.

In this guide, we examine five U.S. News rankings failures. We consider the methodology and underlying rankings theory from the perspective of a student who features job prospects prominently in his application and enrollment decisions. Considering the near universal support for prioritizing job outcomes in the process, these failures demonstrate just some of the reasons annual consternation hardly seems worth it.

We would like to categorically describe the U.S. News rankings as "worse than useless," but that bypasses an important threshold question: What are you using the rankings for?

If you'd like a vague idea about the median LSAT and GPAs of the most recent class, U.S. News rankings provide it, though you could of course just look at the actual LSAT and GPA data. If you want to know what other professors think about a particular school, the rankings provide a clue about that as well, though much is likely due to an echo chamber effect. If you're a dean and want to justify soaring tuition, poor financial management, and a thirst for competition, then the U.S. News rankings are really quite great.

But if what you're after is the answer to the question "Which law school should I go to?" or "Is this law school right for me?" then yes, the U.S. News rankings are worse than useless.

Five Failures of the U.S. News Rankings

Word Cloud Image Word cloud of LSAT test-takers on their purpose of getting a J.D. Source: ATL.

As a tool for making application and enrollment decisions, the U.S. News rankings fail on a number of fronts. First, the rankings pay insufficient attention to what matters most to prospective students: job outcomes. In a survey of 600 students studying for the October 2012 LSAT, Breaking Media's research arm found that the two most popular words associated with the students' purpose of getting a J.D. were "career" and "work" (image to the right). These are not exactly shocking results. Despite the importance of job outcomes, they account for only 18% of the rank and credit schools for jobs few attend law school to pursue.

Second, the rankings use a national scope, which places schools on the same scale. Only a handful of schools have a truly national reach in job placement. The rest have a regional, in-state, or even just local reach. The relative positioning of California Western and West Virginia in the rankings is virtually meaningless. Graduates from these schools do not compete with one another.

State Outcomes

It turns out that 170 schools placed at least half of their employed class of 2015 graduates in one state. The top state destination for each school accounts for 69% of employed graduates. A much smaller 8.0% of employed graduates go to a school's second most popular destination, with just 4.4% of employed graduates working in the third most popular destination. Only 18.7% of employed graduates (15.8% of the entire class) end up in a state other than the top three. Comparing schools across the country just doesn't make sense.

Third, U.S. News rankings follow an ordinal system that fails to show the degree of difference between schools. Are Columbia and NYU virtually tied? Or does the two-rank difference represent a wide gulf in quality? Is the so-called difference between Columbia and NYU the same as the difference between Cornell and Vanderbilt? Students weighing school prices need to know not just which school is better but how much better it is.

Fourth, performance changes over time but year-to-year comparisons are virtually impossible using the U.S. News rankings. U.S. News will tell you that Stanford knocked Harvard out of the #2 spot in 2012-13, but the swap in rankings does not provide any clues to your average reader as to why. Stanford may have improved while Harvard declined. Or, Stanford may have improved while Harvard's quality stayed the same. Or perhaps both schools saw a decline in quality but Harvard's decline was more severe. In fact, if every single school saw a marked decline in quality the U.S. News rankings would not indicate that this happened. Instead, students can know only relative performance.

Finally, U.S. News inexplicably places every ABA accredited law school on the list of "The Best." The best at what? U.S. News doesn't say. But it implies that every school on the list is good. The truth is that once costs and employment outcomes are considered in comparison to personal career goals, many schools are bad choices. The U.S. News rankings provide no help in drawing the line.

Parting Thoughts

U.S. News wants to be the duct tape of law school applications. No matter what your career goals, geographic preference, or financial situation are, it wants to be the answer. The truth is that the U.S. News rankings produce bad outcomes for applicants and law schools alike.

Not only do the U.S. News rankings measure the wrong things, but they put schools in the wrong order for job outcomes, make meaningless comparisons between schools which are not in competition, provide no way of telling what a difference in rankings mean, and provide strong encouragement for schools to push tuition levels to brave new heights. They provide for some great gossip and intrigue once a year, but when it comes to helping you make a $200,000 investment, they are worse than useless.

Rankings are not inherently bad. In fact, they are conceptually quite useful. They order comparable things to help people sort through more information than they know how to or can weigh. However, ranking credibility may be lost when methodologies are unsound, through irrational weighting or meaningless metrics, or when the scope is too broad. As previously described, the U.S. News rankings are victim to many of these flaws.

LST has developed the LST Reports in an effort to produce a tool to help prospective students make application and enrollment decisions, keeping in mind that each person has a different risk tolerance and financial situation. Though the LST Reports have a number of opportunities for improvement, little of what makes the U.S. News rankings flawed applies to the LST Reports. They unambiguously measure job outcomes, use a regional scope, and use real terms about the outcomes to allow prospective students to make an educated decision about not just which school to attend, but whether any school happens to meet their needs. Click here to read our guide to using the LST Reports.